W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

RE: partial comments on JSON-LD document

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:58:50 +0200
To: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, "'Peter Patel-Schneider'" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01d301cdb0a0$6be8d790$43ba86b0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Sunday, October 21, 2012 12:19 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:

> On Oct 20, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
> > @graph is not needed "to express a set of JSON-LD node definitions
> that may
> > not be directly related to one another".  This wording should be
> changed.
> 
> It should definitely defer to the RDF Concepts discussion on named
> graphs, as this is purely a JSON-LD syntactic expression.

Agreed, this was quite confusing. I tried to improve it [1] but that section
probably needs some more love.


Best,
Markus

[1]
https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/dc9e1d268af9f204f94b7f100514cd
cc42082f43


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 21:59:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT