W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [ALL] agenda 10 Oct telecon

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:33:26 -0400
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20121009203323.GC1605@w3.org>
* Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> [2012-10-09 20:16+0100]
> Here is the extracted core proposal text for each Turtle issue, in
> case it helps people prepare for the TC.  The links have the full
> text and discussion.

These are also indexed on
  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/I18n-Comments


> 	Andy
> 
> 
> ==== Turtle LC comments
> 
>     ISSUE-178: Reference IETF BCP 47 for language declaration label
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0008.html
> 
> PROPOSAL: wedge in a not-too-contrived ref in section 7 Parsing:
> "and an optional language tag [BCP47] or datatype IRI" per editor's
> draft.
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-179: Scope of document language label
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0001.html
> 
> PROPOSAL: Turtle will not add a method to declare the language of
> the document.
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-180: Various random character references should be more
> explicit label
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0009.html
> 
> PROPOSAL: add this markup [[ (<span
> class="codepoint">#005E</span>)"]] to the first reference to each
> character per the editor's draft <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#turtle-literals>.
> 
> ----
> 
> 
>     ISSUE-181: Non-ASCII IRI example
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0010.html
> 
> PROPOSAL: add this example [[ <http://伝言.example/?user=أكرم&amp;
> channel=R%26D> a :subject8 . # a multi-script subject IRI . ]] to
> 2.4 IRIs per the editor's draft <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#turtle-literals>.
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-182: cultural relevance of examples
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0011.html
> 
> 
> PROPOSAL: no change.
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-184: Malformed escapes examples
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0012.html
> 
> PROPOSAL: Use the text U+xx form [[ U+B7, U+300 to U+36F and U+203F
> to U+2040 are permitted anywhere except the first character. ]] per
> the editor's draft <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#BNodes>
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-185: Line terminator assumptions
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0023.html
> 
> 
> PROPOSAL: Alter the text introducing the 4th example in §3 to say "
> The line breaks in this example are LINE FEED characters (U+0A)."
> per editor's draft <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-examples>
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-188: special handling of % in IRI
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0013.html
> 
> (no change)
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE 189
> 
> See thread starting with:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0043.html
> 
> ????

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/I18n-Comments#189:_.5BS.5D_reference_obs-language-tag_instead_of_defining_your_own


> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-190: attempting to erase combining marks?
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0014.html
> 
> PROPOSAL: No change
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-191: Various nits in Appendix B
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0017.html
> 
> (One small edit proposed)
> 
> ----
> 
>     ISSUE-193: define when escapes are evaluated marks?
> 
> Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0016.html
> 
> Proposal: no change
> 
> ----
> 

-- 
-ericP
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 20:33:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:51 GMT