Re: [ALL] agenda 10 Oct telecon

Here is the extracted core proposal text for each Turtle issue, in case 
it helps people prepare for the TC.  The links have the full text and 
discussion.

 Andy


==== Turtle LC comments

     ISSUE-178: Reference IETF BCP 47 for language declaration label

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0008.html

PROPOSAL: wedge in a not-too-contrived ref in section 7 Parsing: "and an 
optional language tag [BCP47] or datatype IRI" per editor's draft.

----

     ISSUE-179: Scope of document language label

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0001.html

PROPOSAL: Turtle will not add a method to declare the language of the 
document.

----

     ISSUE-180: Various random character references should be more 
explicit label

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0009.html

PROPOSAL: add this markup [[ (<span class="codepoint">#005E</span>)"]] 
to the first reference to each character per the editor's draft 
<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#turtle-literals>.

----


     ISSUE-181: Non-ASCII IRI example

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0010.html

PROPOSAL: add this example [[ <http://伝言.example/?user=أكرم&amp; 
channel=R%26D> a :subject8 . # a multi-script subject IRI . ]] to 2.4 
IRIs per the editor's draft 
<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#turtle-literals>.

----

     ISSUE-182: cultural relevance of examples

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0011.html


PROPOSAL: no change.

----

     ISSUE-184: Malformed escapes examples

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0012.html

PROPOSAL: Use the text U+xx form [[ U+B7, U+300 to U+36F and U+203F to 
U+2040 are permitted anywhere except the first character. ]] per the 
editor's draft 
<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#BNodes>

----

     ISSUE-185: Line terminator assumptions

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0023.html


PROPOSAL: Alter the text introducing the 4th example in §3 to say " The 
line breaks in this example are LINE FEED characters (U+0A)." per 
editor's draft 
<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-examples>

----

     ISSUE-188: special handling of % in IRI

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0013.html

(no change)

----

     ISSUE 189

See thread starting with: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0043.html

????

----

     ISSUE-190: attempting to erase combining marks?

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0014.html

PROPOSAL: No change

----

     ISSUE-191: Various nits in Appendix B

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0017.html

(One small edit proposed)

----

     ISSUE-193: define when escapes are evaluated marks?

Proposal: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0016.html

Proposal: no change

----

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 19:17:24 UTC