On 21/11/12 18:47, Pat Hayes wrote: > The business of the WG should not be to discuss fine details of wordings before the relevant documents are even fully written. "Proposed Specification Changes" and telecon time suggests to me that discussion is being asked for. On 21/11/12 19:05, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > My intention was not to interfere with the job of the editors, and I > apologize it that sounded that way. Thank you for trying. AndyReceived on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 22:43:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:53 GMT