On Nov 16, 2012, at 09:28 , Richard Cyganiak wrote: [snip] > > Background: This should make it possible to take the informative entailment rules out of Semantics, and put those for Simple Entailment and RDF-with-literals Entailment as an appendix into RDF Concepts, and those for RDFS Entailment into RDF Schema, each time with a clear statement that the normative form is the model theory found in RDF Semantics. > Yes, but is this a good idea? I thought we discussed having all the rules in a separate document (as a Note); what is wrong with that? Ivan > Best, > Richard ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Friday, 16 November 2012 14:33:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:53 GMT