- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:01:26 +0000
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 14 Nov 2012, at 17:20, Pat Hayes wrote: > I added a sentence to the wiki, regarding copying: "If the source and target scopes are different, and the blank node identifiers do not occur elsewhere in either scope, this can be achieved by simply using the same blank node identifiers in both graphs." Very useful, thanks. I believe it's not a problem if the identifiers occur elsewhere in the source scope? They're still fresh within the target scope. Richard > > Pat > > On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >> Following recent discussions, I've written up a proposal to change the design of blank nodes in RDF by explicitly introducing scoped blank node identifiers into the abstract syntax. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/User:Rcygania2/B-Scopes >> >> Requirements: >> >> • Consistency with all resolutions the WG has made so far >> • No changes to other specs beyond Concepts and Semantics required > > Actually I don't think any changes to Semantics are required. At most, small editorial re-wordings. > >> • No changes to conforming implementations required >> >> All further details are in the wiki. >> >> Comments welcome. >> >> Best, >> Richard >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:02:02 UTC