W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:46:13 +0000
Message-ID: <50A0C565.2010406@webr3.org>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
+1 in return to that - can this be a separate issue? and get a vote at 
the next teleconf?

Pat Hayes wrote:
> +1 from me on "RDF Source". FWIW, referring to my earlier response to Richard on blank nodes, this can also serve the role of my old terminology of "surface", so that we can say that bnodes (not bnode IDs, but actual blank nodes) are local to the RDF source in which they occur, i.e., no bnode can be in (graphs contained in) two different sources. This would clean up the current mess about the distinction between unions and merges of RDF graphs, and generally make more sense of bnodes. 
> 
> Pat
> 
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Nathan wrote:
> 
>> Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Yes, and I'm putting this resolution forward to feed the fresh discussion, and as a proposal to resolve the issue:
>>> PROPOSAL1: the notion informally known as "g-box" will be called "graph container".
>>> Alternative:
>>> PROPOSAL2: the notion informally known as "g-box" will be called "RDF container".
>>> Alternative (cf. Kingsley's email on the topic):
>>> PROPOSAL3: the notion informally known as "g-box" will be called "RDF document".
>>> Alternative (cf. Kingsley's other email on the topic):
>>> PROPOSAL3: the notion informally known as "g-box" will be called "RDF source".
>>> Personal vote:
>>> -1 for RDF document. Mostly shrug on any of the remaining 3 options but a slight preference for one of the first 2 choices.
>> +1 for RDF Source, as RDF Container may be confusing in the context of LDP, RDF Document indicates the RDF is static, and graph container doesn't indicate that the things has changing states.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 09:47:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT