W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:18:07 +0000
Message-ID: <509D2CBF.4060306@webr3.org>
To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
CC: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> Yes, and I'm putting this resolution forward to feed the fresh 
> discussion, and as a proposal to resolve the issue:
> 
> PROPOSAL1: the notion informally known as "g-box" will be called "graph 
> container".
> 
> Alternative:
> 
> PROPOSAL2: the notion informally known as "g-box" will be called "RDF 
> container".
> 
> Alternative (cf. Kingsley's email on the topic):
> 
> PROPOSAL3: the notion informally known as "g-box" will be called "RDF 
> document".
> 
> Alternative (cf. Kingsley's other email on the topic):
> 
> PROPOSAL3: the notion informally known as "g-box" will be called "RDF 
> source".
> 
> Personal vote:
> -1 for RDF document. Mostly shrug on any of the remaining 3 options but 
> a slight preference for one of the first 2 choices.

+1 for RDF Source, as RDF Container may be confusing in the context of 
LDP, RDF Document indicates the RDF is static, and graph container 
doesn't indicate that the things has changing states.
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 16:18:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT