- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:14:37 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
We had a formal resolution about the names of the g-stuff: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-10-12#resolution_1 --AZ Le 09/11/2012 11:34, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker a écrit : > RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/110 > > Raised by: Richard Cyganiak > On product: RDF Concepts > > The concept that we call “g-box” is extremely useful in explaining how RDF works in the real world, and I plan to use it *informatively* in the Introduction of RDF Concepts. > > Should the term in the text be “g-box”, or do we slap some other label on that concept? > > The text is here: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#change-over-time > > > > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 11:15:10 UTC