W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 23:38:49 +0100
To: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Cc: "'Richard Cyganiak'" <richard@cyganiak.de>
Message-ID: <044e01cdbc6f$7de083f0$79a18bd0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
> The new definition is this:
>
> [[
> A literal in an RDF graph consists of two or three elements:
>
> . [lexical form]
> . [datatype IRI]
>
> A literal is a language-tagged string if and only if its datatype IRI is
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#langString, and only in this case
the third element is present:
>
> . [language tag]
> ]]
>
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#dfn-liter
al

I'm sure you already discussed this but unfortunately I wasn't able to find
anything relevant. Was it considered that also literals with datatypes other
than rdf:langString can be language-tagged? I'm specifically thinking of
rdf:html for example..


Thanks,
Markus


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 22:39:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT