Re: three kinds of dataset

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:49:41 -0500 (EST)
• To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20120306.114941.178781737.pfpschneider@gmail.com>

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Subject: three kinds of dataset
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:55:58 -0600

> Ive been trying to pull all these threads together. Seems to me that the
> use cases for quads/datasets fall into three main categories, which
> demand different semantic approaches if we are going to try to avoid
> interoperability confusion. (Now I understand Antoine's proposal I see
> how it manages to be a kind of weakest-possible-blanket-case which
> allows something like all three of these to kind of work, but I would
> argue that we can do better, because this fit-all approach doesn't
> really fit anything quite properly. More below.)

By the way, where is Antoine's proposal?

peter

Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 16:50:17 UTC