On 06/14/2012 10:34 AM, David Wood wrote: > On Jun 14, 2012, at 06:29, Ivan Herman wrote: >> Comment 2: There is, of course, the general question whether it is >> wise to publish a FPWD with a @graph features as long as the >> discussion on named graphs is still raging in the group. Maybe that >> section should be stripped down, for the moment, to the bare >> minimum that is necessary to express a graph with several top level >> subjects... But that is just a thought. I know the API values are >> set in terms of quads but we can say, at this moment, that JSON-LD >> does not yet have a syntax to express the full quads, only those >> for a default graph... > > Conversely (but not disagreeing), we should ensure that the JSON-LD > use cases for named graphs are reflected in our decisions. I was hoping that what David Wood has said above is how we would approach the discussion around the whole '@graph'/Quads feature in JSON-LD. That is, I think JSON-LD proposes how we do named graphs/datasets in a certain way that makes sense to us (at Digital Bazaar) and us (in the JSON-LD CG). I think that should put pressure on the RDF WG to figure out the RDF Concepts around datasets and Quads. It should not put pressure on JSON-LD to remove a feature that's not fully baked in RDF Concepts yet. I'm going to push back on any notion that we should remove or cripple '@graph' because the RDF Concepts are not worked out on the feature yet. We don't need the RDF Concepts to be worked out for '@graph' to do something useful in JSON-LD. More specifically, Digital Bazaar doesn't need the RDF Concepts to be worked out to put the '@graph' feature to good use (annotating graph provenance, digital signatures on graphs, being able to express multiple sources of information in the same JSON-LD document, etc.) We should continue to have the hard discussion of datasets/@graph and Quads instead of attempting to not have that discussion due to time constraints by putting @graph at risk. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 01:54:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT