Re: opacity

On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:58, Sandro Hawke wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:31 -0500, David Wood wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm not attached to either answer at this point.  I think there is a
>>> strong use case for de dicto functionality, but I think it can be
>>> provided with strings holding RDF graph serializations, if it's not
>>> provided by the multigraph syntax.
>> 
>> 
>> That's interesting.  I understood Andy's proposal to be strongly de
>> re.
> 
> "Andy's proposal" meaning
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-Designs#Typed_Labels
> ?
> 
> Or the "Islands" concept?

The islands concept.

Regards,
Dave

Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 16:03:55 UTC