W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Review of XSD Datatypes 1.1 Changes

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:51:19 -0800
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C4B5DC6D-86B2-4217-B6DC-D64C31465338@ihmc.us>
To: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>

On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Alex Hall wrote:

> The difficulty, of course, is that this example involves the comparison of physical data structures in memory, not abstract mathematical values. Since RDF Semantics deals with abstract mathematical values, I've attempted to limit my discussion to that.

Hmmm. The abstract values that RDF semantics talks about can be *anything*, including physical datastructures in memory, if that is what you want the value space to be. But the value space has to be well-defined: if it is p.s.i.m., then it isn't numbers, is all. But RDF doesnt care which you choose. The XSD value spaces are quite well-defined, but they aren't mathematical numbers as usually understood by mathematicians. Which is perfectly fine: some of my best friends are nonstandard models of arithmetic. 


IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 19:01:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:03 UTC