- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:24:40 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
This came in a bit late for this week, but would be good to add to next week's agenda. Andy, please remind Guus if it doesn't show up. Regards, Dave On Feb 1, 2012, at 09:30, Andy Seaborne wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC#.28A_PRIORITY.29_Exchanging_the_contents_of_RDF_stores > > One of our prioritised UC is "Exchanging the contents of RDF stores". > > I'd like to prose that TriG, without additional semantic or annotation assumptions, meets this UC. The WG should resolve to cover this usage pattern. > > This codifies the situation where no annotations of the graph tagging relationship exists. > > It implies that quads are not an internal implementation matter but a way systems can exchange data. > > Andy >
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:25:08 UTC