W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Intent to close ISSUE-184

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:16:21 -0500
Cc: <public-linked-json@w3.org>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, 'François Daoust' <francois@joshfire.com>
Message-Id: <61551F2D-3AA4-43B8-AFE1-EE0DABBE852C@w3.org>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
I realize this was not part of this issue, but wasn't there a discussion about changing the title of the document as a whole? It still says "JSON-LD API 1.0", whereas the API is irrelevant if I only want to implement a JSON-LD Processor.

Ivan

On Dec 4, 2012, at 12:45 , Markus Lanthaler wrote:

> I added a conformance section [1] to the API spec defining two products: a
> JSON-LD Implementation and JSON-LD Processor. The only difference is that a
> JSON-LD Implementation doesn't have to expose the API defined in the spec
> whereas the JSON-LD Processor has to.
> 
> This resolves ISSUE-184. Therefore, unless I hear objections, I will proceed
> and close the issue in 24 hours.
> 
> 
> [1] http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-api/#conformance 
> [2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/184
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 19:16:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:53 GMT