W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

RE: shared bnodes (Skolems, SPARQL)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:27:26 +0200
To: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007b01cd8680$eb84b090$c28e11b0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:11 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote
 
> On 29/08/12 19:50, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> >>
> >> <http://example.com/a> { _:a a <Foo> }
> >> <http://example.com/b> { _:a a <Bar> }
> >>
> >> i.e. is there one bNode in two graphs, or two one in each graph.
> >
> > Exactly.   This is ISSUE-21 ("Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of
> a
> > quad/multigraph format?")
> >
> > We could do a strawpoll on that here and now.
> >
> > My vote, not surprising anyone, would be:
> >
> > +1 (shared bnodes are needed for several use cases and are simpler
> than
> > using Skolem nodes)
> >
> >     -- Sandro
> 
> +1

+1



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2012 07:28:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:06 UTC