W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: shared bnodes (Skolems, SPARQL)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:10:33 +0100
Message-ID: <503E6929.8090800@epimorphics.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 29/08/12 19:50, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>
>> <http://example.com/a> { _:a a <Foo> }
>> <http://example.com/b> { _:a a <Bar> }
>>
>> i.e. is there one bNode in two graphs, or two one in each graph.
>
> Exactly.   This is ISSUE-21 ("Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a
> quad/multigraph format?")
>
> We could do a strawpoll on that here and now.
>
> My vote, not surprising anyone, would be:
>
> +1 (shared bnodes are needed for several use cases and are simpler than
> using Skolem nodes)
>
>     -- Sandro

+1

	Andy
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:11:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:06 UTC