W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Minimal dataset semantics

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:57:22 +0200
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Message-Id: <8803DC13-4D9E-4928-8BD5-573FB4770A3B@w3.org>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
[slip]

On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:52 , Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> 
>> Antoine provided some sort of a short sentence of what is happening:
>> 
>> "All RDF graphs in an RDF dataset don't mean the same thing. To be explicit about what they mean, we provide a vocabulary that specify the semantics of each graph. We call the semantics assigned to a <name,graph> pair its entailment regime, because it determines what entailments are valid for that pair. For example ..."
> 
> I won't support a proposal that involves vocabulary for selecting the semantics on a per-graph basis. This is *much* too complicated for my taste.
> 
>> Personally, I am little bit afraid of the complexity of the thing to be honest. Hence it may not fly.
> 
> +1.
> 

A possible compromise would be to have an entailment regime selected for the default graph and another one selected for all named graphs. That would make things simpler; it is certainly a simplification of Antoine's current scheme.

Ivan


> Richard


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 10:57:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:06 UTC