W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Contradicting definitions of ?property?

From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:30:22 -0400
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
Message-ID: <20120823173022.GA7180@alpha.dublincore.org>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:55:18AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be slightly more accurate (but perhaps less understandable) to
> > say that the predicate IRI denotes "a property, that is, a resource that
> > can be interpreted as a binary relation"?
> 
> Yes. Or more accurately still, "...which is being interpreted as a...." .

Not "meant to be interpreted" (i.e., by the people who coined it)?

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 17:31:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:06 UTC