W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: A radical proposal.

From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:26:46 -0400
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'W3C RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120820162646.GA23589@alpha.dublincore.org>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> +1.   Yes, let's be okay with the term "graph" (even RDF Graph)
> being fuzzy .    And yes, we should probably have terminology for
> use when we don't want to be fuzzy, like "abstract graph".

+1 - I like where this discussion is going.

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 16:27:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:06 UTC