- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:33:45 -0400
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:37:29AM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >>>You have RDF data sources (datasets or triple collections) > >>>associated with RDF data source names (which can take the form of > >>>an IRI). How about that? ... > >+0.5 - the terms seem okay as long as there's a good story for the difference > >between a "data source" and a "dataset", and between a "dataset" and a "triple > >collection". ... > Yes. > > Data Source -- where you get the data from > Dataset -- an actual collection of triples. > > Thus, you can have a single Data Source Name associated with one or > more datasets; which can also be associated with one or more > triples. So a Data Source Name can "be associated with" either a collection of triples (Dataset or Triple Collection) or with individual triples? Triples, either individually or in collections, can be said to have a (named) Data Source? Tom -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 20:34:18 UTC