- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:59:23 +0200
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Aug 17, 2012, at 15:52 , David Wood wrote: > On Aug 17, 2012, at 09:09, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: >> With apologies for breaching the worm-can. > > Yeah, I was really hoping we could make some progress without getting lost in naming. It is not our most important problem. Besides, polymorphic naming is everywhere in our language not just in computer science. I am not swayed by objections to it. > > So, I don't particularly care about the term space and won't fight over it. "source" works for me, and I would accept the others. Same here. I think it is pretty clearly stated in the document that the term is a placeholder. As far as I am concerned, I can take any term that the WG is happy with. Ivan > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 15:00:01 UTC