- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:47:09 -0400
- To: W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
On 08/16/2012 11:45 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > On Aug 16, 2012, at 16:23 , Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> OK, let me throw out the first counter-proposal. [...] >> 2/ Semantic fixes >> >> [...] >> >> I suggest instead either saying nothing, or saying that the semantics of an RDF dataset is just the semantics of its default graph. >> > As we tried to make clear in the document: the 'essence' of the proposal is what you just said and what we tried to put there, ie, that "the semantics of an RDF dataset is just the semantics of its default graph" (by default). If the formal, mathematics part is wrong and if it would lead to too much complications to to get it right then, by all means, I am *personally* happy to just nuke it. > > Ivan My proposal is to just say the 'essence'. The document currently goes beyond this, though. peter
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 17:47:39 UTC