W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Labelled graphs

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:03:26 +0100
Message-ID: <4F96887E.2040500@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 17/04/12 16:59, Guus Schreiber wrote:
...

> An attempt at formulating a possible conclusion/consensus from this thread:
>
> * Non-typed labels are simply associations, no special semantics
>
> * Typed labels: we do not seem to come up with more than these two:
>
> 1. The label is typed as a rdf:StaticGraphContainer:
> the graph labeled is a g-snap of the label URL
> 2. The label is types as a rdf:Graph:
> the label denotes the graph it labels
>
> * When the same label is used multiple times in the same dataset, the
> graph is
> assumed to be the union of the graphs labeled with it
>
> The appears to be in line to the 6.1 design, with some
> modifications/specializations.
>
> Guus

(sorry for the delay - was not at work)

Guus - nice summary.

	Andy
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 11:04:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:04 UTC