- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:40:18 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 10/04/12 23:38, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Crawlers wont necessarily report all the data from each source. For > instance, they could quite plausibly truncate at 100MB source text. > > With 'complete-graphs' semantics, they would have to flag that fact in > the metadata somewhere; with 'incomplete-graph' semantics, then I expect > truncating crawlers wouldn't bother to flag it, since their report would > still be correct. RDF is monotonic. Adding some triple can not change the meaning of something else; it can only be a further restriction on the possibilities described. Can you show how adding a declaration of incompleteness of the graph semantics isn't breaking monontonicity? Andy
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 07:40:53 UTC