Re: Datayped tagged literals: a case for option 4 vs option 2d from Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider on 2011-09-26 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from September 2011)

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:09:57 -0400
To: <J.Wielemaker@vu.nl>
CC: <steve.harris@garlik.com>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110926.100957.1008907134926403271.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Jan Wielemaker <J.Wielemaker@vu.nl>
Subject: Re: Datayped tagged literals: a case for option 4 vs option 2d
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:44:29 -0500

[...]

> I know datatypes are organized in a hierarchy (see
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#built-in-datatypes), but I'm not aware
> that this hierarchy can be queried in RDF. 

I'm quite sure that no part of the RDF semantics sanctions this sort of
relationship between classes that are datatypes.

peter

Received on Monday, 26 September 2011 14:25:58 UTC