Re: WG Time on RDF Literals issue

> I think we're spending a lot of time on the literal issue yet it is  
> supposed to be a time permitting work item. It would be a shame if  
> more important issues such as graphs were pushed out into a wg  
> extension.
>

+1

Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 8 Sep 2011, at 09:17, Ian Davis wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I think we're spending a lot of time on the literal issue yet it is  
> supposed to be a time permitting work item. It would be a shame if  
> more important issues such as graphs were pushed out into a wg  
> extension.
>
> To be honest I'm not even sure what the pressing need is to change  
> literals in this way. I would vote for option 1 in the poll currently.
>
> Ian
>

Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 08:26:06 UTC