- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:06:38 -0700
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I wondered whether the new text should have the word "informally", e.g. "informally, the value space is"; since we have just said that there is no formal datatype! Also I note that non-normative text, is editorial and the editors have discretion over it; so the meat of the proposed change is the "Modify RDF Semantics appropriately" which is asking the editor to make normative changes Jeremy On 10/20/2011 1:25 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > +1 > > Ivan > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 06:30 , Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >> In the proposed text: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Sep/0083.html >> >> Replace: >> >> **** >> 5. DATATYPES >> >> Add to end of section: >> >> [[ >> NOTE: Language-tagged strings have the datatype IRI rdf:langString. No datatype is formally defined for this IRI because the definition of datatypes does not accommodate language tags. >> ]] >> **** >> >> with >> **** >> 5. DATATYPES >> >> Add to end of section: >> >> [[ >> NOTE: Language-tagged strings have the datatype IRI rdf:langString. >> No datatype is formally defined for this IRI because the definition of datatypes does not accommodate language tags. >> The value space of rdf:langString is the set of all pairs of strings and language tags. >> ]] >> >> Modify RDF Semantics appropriately to hard code the class extension of rdf:langString as above. >> **** >> >> >> >> > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 18:07:04 UTC