W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:36:47 +0100
Message-ID: <4E9AFA0F.5060008@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org 
> DELETE { ?x rdf:rest rdf:nil }
> INSERT { ?x rdf:first 1, 2, 3 }
> WHERE { ?x ref:rest rdf:nil }

More interesting if it's

DELETE { ?x rdf:rest rdf:nil }
INSERT { ?x rdf:rest (1 2 3) }
WHERE { ?x rdf:rest rdf:nil }

	Andy
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2011 15:37:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT