- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:12:54 +0100
- To: Ian Davis <id@talis.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 15 October 2011 11:01, Ian Davis <id@talis.com> wrote: > FWIW I find the term archaic slightly derogatory. I've used it in FOAF since it doesn't offend me as editor of FOAF spec; and as for instance data publishers, I think it has about the right level of unsettlingness about it. But I'm curious if it is also derogatory to publishers of data that use the old-fashioned terms. That wouldn't be so nice... Dan
Received on Saturday, 15 October 2011 10:13:22 UTC