Re: RDF-ISSUE-78 (Doc-datasets): Document Convention for Using Datasets [RDF Primer] from Andy Seaborne on 2011-10-14 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from October 2011)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:06:37 +0100
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4E9825CD.50201@epimorphics.com>

Clarification request:

What is the status of documenting other conventions, e.g. the form in 
the original named graph paper where <URI, graph> is URI naming a g-snap 
(required for the time varying g-boxes, which I belive contains zero new 
ideas, only uses existing ones).

 Andy

On 14/10/11 01:22, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> RDF-ISSUE-78 (Doc-datasets): Document Convention for Using Datasets [RDF Primer]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/78
>
> Raised by: David Wood
> On product: RDF Primer
>
> The WG will non-normatively document one particular convention for using datasets, where in<u,G>  the URI denotes+awww:identifies a graph container and G is the state of the container.  This results from a straw poll at FTF2.
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 12:07:10 UTC