Re: Possible named graph issue from Dan Brickley on 2011-10-14 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from October 2011)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:05:05 +0100
To: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAFNgM+anHx4K=mwHG72kh91oc6O=V-3GVFuKAYRK++iBYbVnrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, 13 October 2011, Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com> wrote:
> We got consensus on this strawpoll:
>
> STRAWPOLL: The WG will non-normatively document one particular convention
for using datasets, where in <u,G> the URI denotes+awww:identifies a graph
container and G is the state of the container.
>
> Should we turn this into an tracked issue?

Yes

Dan


> Ian Davis, Chief Technology Officer, Talis Group Ltd.
> http://www.talis.com/ | Registered in England and Wales as 5382297
>

Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 00:05:44 UTC