W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1)

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:29:43 -0400
Message-ID: <20111013.072943.2255816134777914438.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: <sandro@w3.org>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Subject: Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:16:33 -0500

> On 12 Oct 2011, at 22:04, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> 1. If a system successfully dereferences URL "L" and obtains a
>> representation of an RDF graph, then <L> is a GraphContainer.  That
>> is, "L" denotes a GraphContainer.  Logically, GraphContainer is
>> disjoint from foaf:Person (I think!!) so a document that includes "<>
>> a foaf:Person" is (by this proposal) logically inconsistent with it
>> being served on the Web.
> 
> This seems a logical consequence from httpRange-14.

I don't read this in 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html

Maybe it comes from http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ section 2.2 as well,
although I find the world view in that section to be somewhat muddled. 
In particular, there is a distinction between a web document (that may
have a physical existence) and the non-physical information resource
that is not well explained there.

[...]

> Richard

peter
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 11:30:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:45 GMT