W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:14:40 -0400
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0BEC1804-4122-431F-9B1C-B8E841D49C08@3roundstones.com>
Hi all,

Thanks for expressing interest in the various Graph TF use cases.  I have prioritized the use cases on the wiki at [1].  The numbering was not changed for convenience - new use cases were added to the bottom of each section.

The use cases more people expressed interest in are marked (A PRIORITY) before their names.  The ones less people expressed interest in were marked either (B priority) or (C priority) as appropriate.

There are five clear winners:
1.1 (A PRIORITY) Slicing datasets according to multiple dimensions
1.3 (A PRIORITY) Graph Changes Over Time
1.5 (A PRIORITY) Exchanging the contents of RDF stores
4.9 (A PRIORITY) Trust Web Opinions
5.2 (A PRIORITY) OWL's “Ontology Documents”

The use case with the most interest was 1.1 (and is also my highest priority need at the moment).  Sandro's new trust use case is 4.9, which also has strong support.

I suggest we focus our discussions at FTF2 on these five use cases, and broaden to the "B priority" use cases if we have time.

Regards,
Dave

[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC


On Oct 6, 2011, at 15:28, Alex Hall wrote:

> The use cases I'm interested in:
> 
> 1.1 Slicing datasets according to multiple dimensions
> 1.4 Tracing inference results
> 2.2 Computed Graphs (specifically a SPARQL engine that defines a virtual "graph" as a combination of other graphs/services).
> 5.1 SPARQL's “RDF Dataset” and “Graph store”
> 5.2 OWL's “Ontology Documents”
> 6.1 Separate Ontology Use Case
> 
> Regards,
> Alex
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:56 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We would like to prioritize the use cases for named graphs [1] before FTF2.
> 
> At today's telecon, the following use cases were deemed important to attendees:
> - 1.1 Slicing datasets according to multiple dimensions
> - 1.5 Exchanging the contents of RDF stores
> - 1.6 Versioning in SDMX and DDI
> - 5.2 OWL's “Ontology Documents”
> - 6.2 Reasoning over annotations
> 
> Further, it was proposed to drop the following use case:
> - 4.8 Provenance Information and Data Retention
> ...and add Sandro's provenance use case [2] in place of several existing provenance use cases (to be determined).
> 
> Please note that the numbers are for reference only until the page is modified.  The numbers *will* change, no later than Friday.  The numbers in this message are from revision 1473 [3].
> 
> If you object to these changes or have others to suggest, please respond to this message and/or update the wiki.  Thanks.  I will update the wiki no later than this weekend prior to the ftf.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-prov/2011Sep/0003.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/index.php?title=TF-Graphs-UC&oldid=1473
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 16:15:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:45 GMT