W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

RDF Concepts - bad reference?

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:56:58 +0100
Message-ID: <4E9218AA.9030006@epimorphics.com>
To: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-Literals

refers to charmod section 4 via a WD from 2003.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-charmod-20030822/#sec-Normalization

but that section isn't in the REC version of charmod.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/


The text seems to have gone into

http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm/
http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm/#sec-WhyNormalization

but that seems stuck at Working Draft of 27 October 2005


[[
This came up in understanding a Jena/RIOT user query on prefix names in 
Turtle illustrated in a DAWG test case but there's a general Turtle 
issue for literals and prefixed names:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/i18n/normalization-01.ttl
]]

	Andy
Received on Sunday, 9 October 2011 21:57:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:45 GMT