W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Web Semantics for Datasets

From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:25:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAiX05H+QwihKBwrnh4ZA8j_o4ULB8P8ZC52BGQOxV980WudkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, danbri@danbri.org, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

>
> Can you think of a way to frame this better?   Mine was:
>
>        For the graph naming to hold, every successful dereference of N
>        yielding an RDF graph must yield G.
>
>
I would say something like:

For the graph naming to hold, G must be a graph parsed from one of the
temporally-varying set of representations identified by N

"Parsed" might be the wrong word

Ian
-- 
Ian Davis, Chief Technology Officer, Talis Group Ltd.
http://www.talis.com/ | Registered in England and Wales as 5382297
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 14:25:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:45 GMT