W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

RE: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases

From: Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott) <Bauer.Scott@mayo.edu>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:04:23 -0500
Message-ID: <DB4F3F44C64B0547979B5DC5935549E405AEC90A@MSGEBE12.mfad.mfroot.org>
To: "Ian Davis" <id@talis.com>, "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
If 4.8 is being dropped on my recommendation from the IRC chat, please
note that I was attempting to refer to
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC#Applying_Named_Graphs_to
_a_Terminology_Service_Prototype which is obsolete.   I'm working with
Harold Solbrig to revise this to a CTS2 related use case but I don't
know that it will substantially change the focus of our original use
case until we've pushed it along a little further.  -scott

-----Original Message-----
From: public-rdf-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Ian Davis
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:17 PM
To: Andy Seaborne
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases

I think 4.2 web crawling (or aggregation in general) is very important

Also I don't see it on the existing list but being able to edit datasets
at the granularity of the graph rather than the triple is very
important. i.e. It is very convenient to be able to replace all the
triples in one named graph with a new set when doing things like web
crawling.



On 5 Oct 2011, at 20:49, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
wrote:

> I think that:
> 
> 1.3 Graph Changes Over Time
> 
> is also important.
> 
>   Andy
> 
> On 05/10/11 19:56, David Wood wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We would like to prioritize the use cases for named graphs [1] before
FTF2.
>> 
>> At today's telecon, the following use cases were deemed important to
attendees:
>> - 1.1 Slicing datasets according to multiple dimensions
>> - 1.5 Exchanging the contents of RDF stores
>> - 1.6 Versioning in SDMX and DDI
>> - 5.2 OWL's "Ontology Documents"
>> - 6.2 Reasoning over annotations
>> 
>> Further, it was proposed to drop the following use case:
>> - 4.8 Provenance Information and Data Retention ...and add Sandro's 
>> provenance use case [2] in place of several existing provenance use
cases (to be determined).
>> 
>> Please note that the numbers are for reference only until the page is
modified.  The numbers *will* change, no later than Friday.  The numbers
in this message are from revision 1473 [3].
>> 
>> If you object to these changes or have others to suggest, please
respond to this message and/or update the wiki.  Thanks.  I will update
the wiki no later than this weekend prior to the ftf.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC
>> [2] 
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-prov/2011Sep/0003.html
>> [3] 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/index.php?title=TF-Graphs-UC&oldid
>> 73
>> 
>> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 13:04:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:45 GMT