W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Graph labels vs. graph names.

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:11:36 -0700
Message-ID: <4E8D0048.1040808@topquadrant.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 10/5/2011 2:52 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:

On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

>> >  Why is a semantic condition that makes :G2 denote the graph important, while a semantic condition that makes RDF Semantics aware of the web is unimportant?
> Because we want to make some RDF machinery work in a way that needs one 'naming' to be fixed, but not the other.
>

Of course both of these are incredibly important, however one is very 
very hard, involving TAG level stuff and almost all WGs at W3C, the 
other is entirely in scope for this WG. I feel that we should make the 
change we can to clarify the new work we are doing.

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 01:12:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:45 GMT