W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:44:03 +0100
Cc: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DE0CB2D4-6138-4C2E-A2EF-767BC86A0B04@cyganiak.de>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On 4 Oct 2011, at 16:15, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Just to clarify, and kind of as an aside, Richard, in this message, when
> you say "graph" in assertGraph, etc, do you mean g-snap or g-box?   I
> would have expected you to use the term precisely (meaning g-snap), but
> I understood you to be advocating a design where we give URIs to g-boxes
> not g-snaps.    So I'm a little confused.

The point of my message wasn't really about snaps versus boxes, so I didn't think about that when I wrote the triple.

Best,
Richard
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 15:44:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:45 GMT