W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: unicode escapes in prefix names

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:44:35 +0000
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3DBFBD28-1437-4F19-B5DA-6C2908B973E3@garlik.com>
To: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
On 2011-11-22, at 21:26, Gavin Carothers wrote:
>>> but you don't
>>> seem to be arguing that unicode escapes should be allowed in the
>>> strings “@prefix” or “@base” or in the rdf:type shortcut “a”. So it's
>>> not even that consistent.
>> 
>> I suggested some time ago that Turtle adopt the current SPARQL approach of
>> putting unicode escape processing into the input stream.
>> 
> 
> With both implementer and editor hat on I support using the SPARQL
> model for input stream processing of escapes for Turtle. The only
> issues I see are for N-Triples, which may resolve escaping another
> way. There are also some funky issues with error reporting (as the
> parser won't the see the escape sequence but only the character
> produced)

Yes, the SPARQL model seems more sensible and consistent.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 17:45:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT