W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Wording tweaks in Fragment Identifier section

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:45:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPqY83ybOney3AF9MG-Bq4K3pgKoKapHHzeeWDR0FoLv4RKMhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Cc: Yves Raimond <Yves.Raimond@bbc.co.uk>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
> Gavin, you mentioned you had problems making sense of the last sentence. I changed it to:
>
> [[
> Likewise, RDF graphs embedded in non-RDF representations with mechanism such as RDFa [RDFA-PRIMER] should use fragment identifiers consistently with the semantics imposed by the host language.
> ]]

+1

Thanks,
Gavin

>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 01:46:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT