- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:15:26 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 5/30/2011 4:29 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > require the tag to be valid ... > The language tag, if present, MUST be well-formed On 31 May 2011, at 16:04, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Note that "valid" and "well-formed" are different concepts in RFC 5646 Oh, now I see what you mean. I misspoke in the first sentence; I meant to say “well-formed” throughout. Richard
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 17:15:54 UTC