W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Proposal for resolving ISSUE-64

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:15:26 +0100
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <707E0950-311E-42CC-AB50-BCA57BFD59BC@cyganiak.de>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
On 5/30/2011 4:29 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> require the tag to be valid
...
> The language tag, if present, MUST be well-formed

On 31 May 2011, at 16:04, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Note that "valid" and "well-formed" are different concepts in RFC 5646

Oh, now I see what you mean. I misspoke in the first sentence; I meant to say “well-formed” throughout.

Richard
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 17:15:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:43 GMT