W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:17:11 +0100
Message-ID: <4DDBAFD7.2030108@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 24/05/11 13:21, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 24 May 2011, at 13:10, Steve Harris wrote:
>> I agree with Andy, this is not going to play well with existing systems, unless rdf:LanguageTaggedString exists purely in the abstract syntax, you can still end up with literals with both a datatype, and a language tag.
>
> It *does* purely exist in the abstract syntax, as I said in my mail but you snipped it:
>
> 7. In concrete syntaxes, the "foo"@en form MUST be used for rdf:LanguageTaggedStrings. [1]


Concepts ==>
"""
The RDF abstract syntax is a set of triples, called the RDF graph.
"""

To date, the result of parsing in all toolkits I'm aware of is that the 
output is RDF abstract syntax, or though of as such.  It's the internal 
representation change that affects systems, not the concrete serialization.

	Andy

>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/StringLiterals/LanguageTaggedLiteralDatatypeProposal
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 13:17:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:43 GMT