- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:18:00 +0200
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C SW CG Group <w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org>, Ian Horrock <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Christopher Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@fr.ibm.com>
Peter, Axel I believe the answer will be 'no', but I just want to check: would the introduction of a new type, and the special nature of the rdf:LanguageTaggedLiteral, have any effect on the OWL 2 and RIF specs from a functional point of view? Note that there is a plan to publish an edited recommendation for both OWL 2 and RIF when the new version of the XSD spec is published as a recommendation. At that point we can add a reference to rdf:LanguageTaggedLiteral to the RIF Datatypes[1] and the OWL 2 structural specification[2] documents (both documents explicitly list the datatypes they handle). Hm... it may not be as simple if the XSD spec comes out before the new RDF spec... Ivan [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-dtb/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/ On May 23, 2011, at 05:01 , Pat Hayes wrote: > The proposal outlined in the wiki here > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/StringLiterals/LanguageTaggedLiteralDatatypeProposal > > completes Richard and my action item 48 from the last telecon. > > Pat > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 08:16:11 UTC