W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

RDF-ISSUE-49 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should the subjects of RDF statements be allowed to be literals" [Cleanup tasks]

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 01:23:17 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QH4Kb-0007Mz-7o@lowblow.w3.org>

RDF-ISSUE-49 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should the subjects of RDF statements be allowed to be literals" [Cleanup tasks]

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/49

Raised by: David Wood
On product: Cleanup tasks

See http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literalsubjects
rdfms-literalsubjects: Should the subjects of RDF statements be
allowed to be literals

CONTINUE: the situation is unclear. In a sense, literals are
resources. Restrictions are largely (but not entirely) syntactic.

NB: Must RESOLVED AS CONTINUE since this is explicitly out of scope for this WG:
Removing current restrictions in the RDF model (e.g., literals not allowed as subjects, or blank nodes as predicates)

Richard proposes to CLOSE, but future WGs may wish to address:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0345.html
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:23:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:42 GMT