RDF-ISSUE-20 (Numeric local part): The prefixed name "ns:123" is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle? [RDF Turtle] from RDF Working Group Issue Tracker on 2011-03-30 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from March 2011)

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:49:44 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Q51Oi-0001oT-6l@lowblow.w3.org>

RDF-ISSUE-20 (Numeric local part): The prefixed name "ns:123" is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle? [RDF Turtle]

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/20

Raised by: Andy Seaborne
On product: RDF Turtle

It is legal in SPARQL 1.0 because of user feedback to an earlier version of the grammar when it wasn't (DAWG).

Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:49:46 UTC