W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:10 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Q4xOQ-0005t0-OG@lowblow.w3.org>


ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/19

Raised by: 
On product:

Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 15:33:13 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Nathan: "Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle?"
Previous message: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker: "ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle?"
Next in thread: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?"
Reply: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?"
Reply: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider: "Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:40 GMT