- From: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:48:51 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 23, 2011, at 13:24, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Instead, I think the advantages of RDF show up on a different set of a > problems. They show up mostly when you need to merge data from multiple > independent sources. Once people see that working, they'll see plenty > of reasons to use RDF. Right. So that suggests that we focus our RDF-in-JSON efforts toward use cases where data is to be merged. We want a JSON format that allows RDF-in-JSON to be merged with other RDF-in-JSON files. Is that captured in any of the existing use cases? Do others disagree with this? Regards, Dave
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:49:27 UTC