Re: [JSON] The case for a triple-based approach

Richard,

Great summary, including the "unsure where to go from here" bit.

I am very much on the "higher-vision-camp" side, with my limited world
view I currently don't see much added value of a simple triple objects
array, but could be convinced of the other way (would these triple
objects be microsyntax-based for complex types, or language
attributes?). Isn't this just N-Tripes in a JSON envelope?

Two formats would be confusing.
+1

It (JSON triples-objects) wouldn't be a game changer.
+1

Whom do we want to do a favor? Publishers? Consumers? What would be
the added value over vanilla JSON for both, the consumer and the
publisher side?

I think the F2F is gonna be interesting...

Thanks,
Tom

-- 
Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc.
http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 15:50:17 UTC